Sinners, Aliens, and God Complexes: The Best of 2025



Much like the flying sparks and energy surges in Frankenstein’s laboratory as he slaves away at reviving the flesh of freshly decomposing tissue, the part of my brain that worships at the altar of cinema started to regain life in earnest over the past year. A critic will always be a critic and have their opinions, of course, and evidence of my oath to that has continued to exist in a jolt here and a twitch there across social media. Yet, it’s only amid the chaos of 2025, the combination of worldly worries and the tribulations of toddler parenting, that the film criticism muscles started regaining their memory amid a fascinating slate of high-quality pieces of work, arguably one of the best calendar years of releases -- especially for the horror genre -- that we’ve seen in almost a decade, and uniquely timed at theaters and streaming so that a broader audience can stay on top of most or all of it. 

Despite the gap in time, we’re doing things the way I’ve always done them: below you’ll find a list of ten or so films that really struck a chord with me from the past year, laid out in alphabetical order due to my aversion to ranking creations with such different objectives and complexities. This may not be a comprehensive evaluation of the year's entire output, but I've been lucky enough to see a sizable chunk of the noteworthy cinema to construct an informed list of "the good stuff". Great to be back, hope to be back with a regular vengeance.

Bugonia

In Bugonia, the character played by Emma Stone insists to her conspiracy theorist captor,  impeccably realized by Jesse Plemons, that she isn’t an alien, attributing her youthful appearance to anti-aging regiments that are very expensive. She may not be a literal alien in Yorgos Lanthimos’ dark kidnapping thriller, but when she’s a corporate bigwig on that level of importance and freedom, perhaps she might as well be. Those are the sociopolitical ideas tumbling around as the reality of a harrowing abduction plays out, shrewdly photographed with Emma Stone’s uniquely wide, vivid eyes as a centerpiece, her masterful performance launching the character from boilerplate business troubleshooting to darker verbal manipulation and then to fraught speeches that are, frankly, out of this world. A marvel of blunt-force thematic trauma and cloaked metaphors about humanity, population control, and self-destruction, Bugonia might not be the film that gets rewatched as often as the others on this list due to its grim, guttural nature, but I be damned if it doesn’t continue to buzz in the mind long and hard after this smartly-crafted remake unmasks its truths.


Companion

Science fiction has been warning us for a long time about the dangers of artificial intelligence gaining control of our day-to-day lives, yet still we seem to have been slow-walking to a meeting point between technologies -- independent-thinking synthetic intelligence and autonomous robot and drone technology -- that looks suspiciously like all the ingredients needed for the bad stuff to happen, just unassembled. Companion operates best knowing less of the specifics about what’s really going on as possible during a couple’s retreat at a lake house, but going in with the knowledge that it’s set in a near future where we’ve bridged at least some of that gap to “the bad stuff” won’t ruin anything. With Sophie Thatcher at the core as a disarming emotional force in the vessel of an awkward yet devoted girlfriend, writer/director Drew Hancock uses technology, robotics, and the transactional nature of human interactions to create fast, cerebral cat-and-mouse horror that can’t help from urging caution in many of the same way as other pieces of sci-fi have over the years, only on a more prescient and intimate level.


Eddington

There’s a scene in Eddington where Joaquin Phoenix’s small-town sheriff character lumbers through a Democratic fundraiser with a very-Texan stride, goes straight for a sound machine to turn off loud music, then turns and walks away ... only for the exact same song to flip back on with him still there. This is executed with almost laugh-out-loud comedic timing and would effortlessly spark that reaction at other times, but there’s an entire Ari Aster amount of cinematic context that happens before it, where a fictional Texas town becomes the perfect microcosm for COVID-era politics: it’s just big enough for world events to have impact and opinions to matter, but not big enough that people aren’t compelled to ignore inconvenient protocols because they believe the problem won’t reach their city. From rigid distancing policies and conspiracy theories to social-media influence and money tied up in politics, Eddington endures a little of everything in its absorbing war between Democratic mayor Ted Garcia and his power-strapped contender for the office, Sheriff Cross, realizing a comedy of errors in calculated maneuvers that get a little too close to the border of realism for their own good.


Frankenstein

I’ll admit: the first time I heard Guillermo Del Toro say that he’s "not doing a horror movie” for Frankenstein gave me pause. While I understood the gist of what he meant about adapting Mary Shelley’s tale with objectives in mind other than those of classical genre pictures, it was concerning that he might not invoke enough gore and grotesquery for the tale of reanimated flesh and mad-science god complexes. He’s among a select few modern directors who have earned some faith in the mystique of their craftsmanship, and man, does his version of Frankenstein deliver on his promise. From the moment you see Oscar Isaac’s Dr. Frankenstein controls strung-together flesh like a puppet for a lecture about bringing the dead back to life, it becomes clear there’s no absence of horror here. The visuals, full of towering red columns of light amid gothic architecture, are disarming; the practical effects involving slicing up and jolting alive viscera are gruesome yet gorgeous. It’s the tragic, expressive performances that make this Frankenstein, though, and enough positive things can’t be said about the lithe, intimidating presence Jacob Elordi brings to Frankenstein’s Monster.


One Battle After Another

Paul Thomas Anderson’s films usually have a lot going on in them, both in the layers and perspectives of the story and the ideas and themes he’d like for the audience to take away, and One Battle After Another is no exception. With a particularly emotive Leonardo DiCaprio leading the charge as explosives specialist revolutionary Ghetto Pat in love with a fellow fiery independent woman for the cause, the film covers two different eras in the history of resistance fighters: when they’re young and free of restraints, and a decade-and-a-half down the line when a daughter becomes involved. While a timely social tapestry gets woven about fighting for immigrants, government and military interference in gaining control of the message, and powerful men jockeying for further power as others suffer — sometimes, with the suffering being the point — One Battle After Another never takes its sight off the human stakes involved in the fabric of a father-daughter relationship and the obsession of an unhinged supremacist military officer to locate them. Sean Penn’s swoop-haired villain Lockjaw might be the most fascinating in a line of fascinating things here: sterile yet putrid, overconfident yet uncomfortable, vascular yet cripplingly weak.


Sinners

All it takes is a few minutes with Michael B. Jordan’s Smoke and Stack twin characters for Sinners to sink in its teeth and cast its spells, showing how writer/director Ryan Coogler’s desire to take a stab at creating twins onscreen transforms into an absorbing period tale set in Prohibition-era South. This isn’t a comic book, but it does have certain mythical sensibilities that capture just as much invigorating entertainment value as one, offering tastes of backstory about how the criminal brothers lived a potent, profitable, passionate life leading up to this return to their hometown. As they drum up connections and resources to open a spot for music and booze, Sinners offers brisk, beautiful storytelling with a deep musical soul long before any advertised bloodsuckers enter the picture to try and crash the party. Once the vampires do show up, Coogler goes for the throat with action-tilted bloodshed backed by fierce symbolism tied to the cultural history of America, accomplishing so much more than similar split-in-half genre pics like From Dusk Till Dawn could even imagine.


Superman

Any messages delivered by director and DC film architect James Gunn involving Superman as a resident alien are quite clear in this quasi-reboot, and this is certainly a James Gunn movie, through and through. The humor both sticks landings and overstays its welcome, there’s a lot of cool secondary character involvement without fleshing them out as much as we’d like, and it isn’t afraid to go very, very big with existential threats and action set pieces. Ultimately, those aspects become excusable because of how this Superman’s designed to feel like we’re catching the flow of a narrative that’s already been going for a minute, like you’ve grabbed a shiny new copy of a comic off the rack featuring the rebooted universe. This is also a whole new experience watching Corenswet’s Big Blue Boy Scout in bold, grin-inducing acts of heroism: neither Cavill nor Reeve, he plants his flag somewhere between the two with his borderline eyeroll-worthy idealism, a tough trait to hit. This isn’t “Superman Begins”, by design, but it confidently announces that it’s cut from a different cloth than previous versions and embraces the brighter side of messaging about sympathy, goodwill, and humanity in the face of authoritative manipulation (Hoult is a fab Lex Luthor).


Thunderbolts

Thing is, superhero movie burnout is very real, and I reached that point several stages ago before Marvel and DC both brought their developed universes to a head with Avengers Infinity War/Endgame and Justice League. For those who have felt that cynical, curmudgeonly aggravation creep in, Thunderbolts is a breath of fresh air. Adjacent to The Suicide Squad for DC and led by Black Widow heir apparent Florence Pugh as an ex-assassin searching for solace and purpose in a hero’s world, a downtrodden squad of antiheroes embark on a search for political retribution after surviving a mission designed to eliminate them all, running into overwhelming obstacles and getting their hands dirty with the characters’ flaws and doubts about their worth the closer they get to the architect, CIA director De Fontaine. Then, it becomes funny, and then somber, and then it hits a rhythm lobbying back and forth between those tones … and wouldn’t you know it, it feels meaningful. Action does get outlandish and all-powerful at a certain point, which might ring a few alarms for those tired of the rigamarole, but it’s never without purpose or justification and Thunderbolts never stops being a thinking person’s hero film with a different slate of antagonists.


Wake Up Dead Man

An immensely talented cast curated by Rian Johnson fills Wake Up Dead Man as the flock of an isolated New York church helmed by an austere priest, played by Josh Brolin in a way that immediately sparks thoughts of the barnacled pulpit speaker from Moby Dick and his stormy sermon. Yet, it’s the impassioned energy of Josh O’Connor as a newly-arrived assistant priest that grabs the attention in the front end of yet another of the director’s Agatha Christie-like murder mysteries. Here, we have a priest suspected of murdering another, and watching O’Connor wince and squirm in the presence of those distinctly devout characters makes for fascinating build-up to the killing, nonchalantly piling up themes about organized religion while Johnson maneuvers his puzzle pieces. Then, like clockwork, it happens: the doors swing open and in walks a less-flippant yet still playfully verbose Benoit Blanc, conducted by Daniel Craig as the self-professed “proud heretic” of the lot. Once he’s in the mix, Wake Up Dead Man takes shape as an intricate, intimate whodunit with very few bells-‘n-whistles getting in the way that might stretch the credibility of its grand conclusion, sliding it on the shelf near the front of Johnson’s murder-mystery oeuvre.


Weapons

Something weird has happened again: similar to The Prestige vs. The Illusionist or Saving Private Ryan vs. The Thin Red Line, there’s a striking similarity between two of the finer genre films released this year, Zack Cregger’s Weapons and the Philippou Bros.’ Bring Her Back. Two sides of the same coin, they involve the powerful abilities of witchcraft to control the minds of children for selfish purposes, producing fascinating villains with compelling motives. Here’s where the differences come in: Bring Her Back approaches the idea entirely straight and with devastating emotional drama as its intent, whereas Weapons finds a way to mold similar plot designs and themes into pitch-black comedy and brazen, wide-eyed jump scares. Choosing between them is tough, especially with how effective the gorgeous craftsmanship and the haunting performance from Sally Hawkins are in Bring Her Back; however, Weapons has the benefit of tapping into child-disappearance horror and having fun with perspectives in the unspeakable situation, from watching a young cop commit a comedy of errors and a father awkwardly sleuth across town to the bizarre arrival of Amy Madigan’s now iconic Aunt Gladys. Both outstanding, but I know which one will come off the shelf first during spooky season.


Honorable Mentions




Most Disappointing: Jurassic World: Rebirth

Jurassic World: Dominion may have provided shaky ground for the franchise’s ending to stick its landing, but flaws and all, it wrapped up the messy strands from both the Spielberg and Trevorrow eras in a way so this absurdly modified version of Michael Crichton’s universe could move on. Unable to let the roaring money-making machine go extinct, the newest installment, Rebirth, at least seems like it might be able to rediscover cinematic life as a spinoff. With an enthusiastic Scarlett Johansson as the tip of the spear, a covert spec-ops mission picks up a robust support crew -- Sexiest Man Alive Jonathan Bailey; equally as sexy Mahershala Ali -- and washes them up on an adjacent island away from the original franchise’s main events to gather lucrative bio samples from lesser-seen dinosaurs. No genetic freaks, no overblown stakes, no lazy character baggage. Clean slate. Unfortunately, Rebirth squanders the opportunities afforded to it with new unneeded genetic freaks, excessive displays of visual effects, a family of survivors that could be chomped out of the movie without any impact on the plot ... and an unconvincing ScarJo as that kind of mercenary leader. On top of that, things just start off on the wrong foot by once again making dinosaurs seem mundane in the modern era instead of exciting, and it bypasses intriguing suspenseful possibilities in lieu of a been-there, done-that mission flow from dino to dino that smells like one big pile of obligation.


Best Videogame Experience: Oblivion Remastered

Granted, my gaming exposure was incredibly limited this year due to the demands of life and maintaining other extracurriculars, but I was able to experience the full drama of the Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Remastered “shadow drop”. My love for Oblivion runs in lockstep with my love for sandbox games and RPGs, where exploring the vast, ethereal beauty of Cyrodiil’s secret-riddled landscape pairs with how the game encourages interactions with the characters and pushing the limits of what you can do as a wanderer through its townships. As I’ve discovered over the years, it’s a near-ideal blend of open-world and objective-driven design, more focused than Morrowind and less of a fantasy sim than Skyrim. Odd rumors of Oblivion being remastered have existed since plans and evidence of gameplay showed up within internal documents, but interest dramatically spiked when an insider claimed it was not only ready, but being prepped for a quietly-marketed surprise drop … and wouldn’t ya know it, all the online sleuthing and hyping proved to be true. Dropped the same day as a Bethesda showcase event, Oblivion Remastered is a thing of beauty, a mesmerizing blend of upgraded Unreal graphics and modernized game fluidity -- Fun archery! Sprinting! Leveling improvements! A hell of a character creator! -- with a careful focus on making it look, sound, and feel as it did twenty years prior.


Some Favorite 4K/Blu-ray Releases and Social Posts of 2025




Parting Thoughts

Being away from formal movie writing has been rough but necessary with other life demands, but after a year like 2025 -- both in terms of the brilliant movies released and the chaotic state of the world -- the pull to reintegrate into the critical conversation became too strong to suppress. I'm hoping to rediscover the rhythm from several years back, and while it'll take time to get back to that state, I'm excited to go into the year to come with enthusiasm. All the best, everyone; let's make 2026 a grand return to form.

Film Review: Malignant



Directed by: James Wan; Runtime: 111 minutes
Grade: C

Regardless of how one might feel about the likes of Saw and The Conjuring, it’s hard to dispute that director James Wan has played a crucial role in shaping the modern landscape of horror cinema. One of the reasons why his films have been successful up to this point can be seen in the personal angles found within each: the embittered villain Jigsaw who teaches moral lessons about the value of life; the harrowing scenario of a child’s coma and demonic possession in Insidious; the historical “truths” behind married paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren. Instead of diving back into the sequel well, James Wan has conjured a new vision of stylized terror with Malignant, which again possesses a deeper undercurrent involving pregnancy struggles and repressed memories. This is also Wan’s most audacious creation to date, and while pushing those boundaries may result in outrageously fun gore and haunted house trappings, Malignant cartwheels into a realm of absurdity that its emotive intents can’t back up.

Not unlike Saw, much of the strength behind watching Malignant lies in the bizarre twists and turn that essentially start with the first scene, so I’m going to evade as many revelatory spoilers as possible while offering some idea about what’s going on. Shortly after pregnant medical worker Madison (Annabelle Wallis) returns to her spooky, shadowy multi-story home after a long shift, she and her abusive boyfriend are assaulted by a blur of an invader, putting her in the hospital. While the police are investigating the murder of another local medical professional, they find evidence suggesting that the victim – and, by extension, the killer -- may have some connection to Madison. In turn, Madison begins to have nightmarish visions that tie to this murder … and murders that either haven’t happened yet or just haven’t been discovered. As more details emerge in the investigations, further info is revealed about Madison’s dark past and how it relates to the eerie, deformed dressed-in-black killer wreaking havoc in the area.

James Wan has frequently injected an elevated tone into the reality of his horror films, yet in his previous works they were anchored by enough grimness in their visual language and rhythm of the dialogue that they could still be processed at face value. From the start, there’s something suspiciously overstated about Malignant that, despite equally grim circumstances at the beginning of the film, make it tough to buy into the cinematic illusion. From the gloomy lighting and eerie angles amplifying the extravagant appearance of Madison’s home to the overdramatic dialogue, performances, and soundtrack – complete with a repetitious cover of “Where is My Mind?” that sounds like warning alarms -- the stylization never stops feeling like the trappings of a haunted house with something unnatural hiding behind every corner. Unfortunately, this undermines the emotive drama built around Madison’s post-trauma stress and history of difficulty having children, let alone that Malignant may not even be supernatural in nature.



As soon as the antagonist brandishes a gnarly golden short sword alongside an enigmatic black trench coat, it becomes clear that director Wan and co-screenwriters Ingrid Bisu and Akela Cooper really want the villain to become a thing, not just a one-and-done villain. Malignant furthers that impression with a handful of vicious kill scenes that merge ‘80s-level bloody lavishness with convincing modern execution, making up for some of the clashing aesthetics with outrageous scenes of brutality once the killer begins to execute their list of victims. It’s here that the flashy midnight-movie vibe works best, cloaking the identity of the killer with heavy shadows, loud radio distortion noises and fizzling lightbulbs, and during those moments it doesn’t really matter whether they’re some Freddy or Jason-like monster or a human whose identity is being concealed with movie magic. Malignant has its most undistracted fun when the killer’s allowed to unleash hell and escape without a care for the story going on around it.

Crafting an iconic villain is great and all, but there’s a horror movie trying to exist around them as well, and it’s a maddeningly ridiculous one that’s treading water until Malignant can pull the curtain back on their identity. It’s the kind of horror movie where a young woman will drive far out to an abandoned hospital alone, pull up to the dilapidated building at night on the edge of a steep cliff, and be completely fine with going in despite there being a murderer on the loose killing people involved with the reason she’s out there. The kind of movie -- not unlike Sucker Punch or The Final Girls -- where ups and downs in genuine character behaviors or outlandish locations could theoretically be clues pointing toward a false reality or cheeky horror homages, or directorial shortcomings and misguided flourishes of style … or both. While a plot twist can sort some of this out by explaining why aspects of this character or the atmosphere of that location seemed off at first glance, it isn’t a universal solvent for all strangeness, and the silly aspects of Malignant end up preventing it from thriving as a competent slice of horror.

While James Wan’s latest creation essentially overwhelms the audience with twist after twist, there’s ultimately one seismic revelation at the core of Malignant, and the effectiveness of it will likely depend on who’s watching it: someone who needs twists to obey the rules previously established by the film, or someone who enjoys being shocked by outlandishness regardless of whether it makes sense. I’ll be honest, the way the antagonist “transforms” after this reveal – and the visuals that Wan twists into existence in response to it – almost had me feeling like the second type for a minute, relishing the inventive grotesquery despite what caused it. That said, Malignant tears open too many holes in the story and breaks too many rules of the world it established for the ultimate reveal of the killer’s identity to be taken with any kind of seriousness, where even those with fondness for the likes of David Cronenberg and Dario Argento will find it all a bit of a stretch.

Photos: Warner Bros.

Film Review: Zack Snyder's Justice League

Directed by: Zack Snyder; Runtime: 242 minutes
Grade: C+

The story behind the original theatrical release of Justice League almost overpowered the execution of the film itself, yet that’s arguably even more of the case with this long-awaited, almost mythical unveiling of the “Snyder Cut”. Confirmed to exist by the likes of Jason Momoa, it quickly gained a reputation for being a much-longer and tonally different iteration than Joss Whedon’s serviceably lukewarm reshoots, rewrites, and recuts, and by default was assumed to be the superior version by fans of the movie universe. As a direct result of an aggressive internet campaign and with the introduction of HBO’s new streaming service, HBO Max, the suits at the top and original director Zack Snyder -- who, for those in the dark, also directed Man of Steel and Batman vs. Superman: Dawn of Justice -- came to an agreement that would bring him back to salvage his original vision of Justice League for the new streaming service. Well, after tons of money dumped into it and a long wait, it’s finally here … and? Again, while it certainly does improve upon what came before it in ways, a good 4-hour movie that doesn’t make.

If you’re after a rough synopsis of this story’s founding of the Justice League, the presence of the main villain Steppenwolf, and the need for Superman after his death, check out previous reviews of the theatrical cut -- like mine! -- for that. With that out of the way, the comments that Zack Snyder’s Justice League is literally the same movie as the one from 2017, only longer, should be put to rest: this is not quite the same thing as a slightly tweaked “extended edition”. Motivations have been adjusted. Characters have more substance. Some unpopular quirks from the previous cut have been removed. The visual effects have been extensively reworked, from the design of the main villain to the landscape. To cap it off, this new cut places a stronger emphasis on one of DC’s most significant villains, Darkseid, as the primary impetus for not-so-big bad Steppenwolf coming to Earth. There are noteworthy alterations, and Snyder should be commended for having the bravado to go back into this project with a dark history and realizing his vision.



In another sense, this Snyder Cut of Justice League is absolutely “the same movie”. Some things simply cannot be altered without rewriting the script, chiefly that it’s all about chasing down the trio of magic supercomputer “Mother Boxes” that restructure and annihilate life when they’re synced because the script says they do. This new Snyder Cut offers a modified explanation as to why the boxes were abandoned on Earth in the first place, and the answer isn’t convincing, pushing the narrative even more into the shallow, logic-deficient spectrum than it already was. There’s also a clash of ideas in Justice League, in which Batman / Bruce Wayne scrambles to gather together these superheroes to combat a powerful other-worldly villain all on the backbone of them being able to overcome anything if they’re united … yet completely acknowledges that they’re screwed without bringing Superman back from the dead. The Justice League can do it, so long as the near-impervious and overpowered Man of Steel is around.

So no, the Snyder Cut is neither a pointless extension of the theatrical version of Justice League nor a transformation into the hidden masterpiece that the project’s most stalwart supporters hoped it would be. What Zack Snyder’s Justice League ends up being, however, is an improvement with drawbacks: a project that takes fewer steps back than it takes forward, and a project that makes one understand why parts might’ve been restructured in the first place. Perhaps the most high-profile aspect of this whole thing would be the character of the mechanized super hacker Cyborg, the center of controversy regarding Joss Whedon and how he streamlined Ray Fisher’s role in the narrative. The breadth of his character has been restored, and it’s pretty easy to chalk it up as one of the noteworthy successes in this experiment with rejuvenating the original content. Cyborg does harness more of the “heart and soul” of Justice League here through a bleaker, more affective story; Ray Fisher has some justification behind being disappointed, though I believe the magnitude of his content being reinstated has been oversold.



The antagonist Steppenwolf remains a mess, though, and he isn’t helped by the added larger role for the presumed future DCEU supervillain, his boss and relative Darkseid. Plenty of digital work went into transforming how he looks, and the outcome tends to be a mixed bag of eye candy and dull continuity. The theatrical cut’s design may’ve been bland, but it still captured some of the original character’s vaguely humanoid appearance, whereas this restored “original design” looks like the craggy defeated villain from Batman vs. Superman -- an awkward realization of Doomsday -- glued a bunch of knives all over his body and came back for Round 2. Coupled with the presence of Darkseid, it starts to seem like the rest of the DC villains worth putting onscreen are stony-skinned, broad-faced goons with endless swaths of winged faceless underlings at their disposal. While it’s understandable that Steppenwolf might’ve been remolded to look more like he’s from the same bloodline as Darkseid, this also reveals a lack of inspiration behind the antagonist forces up against the League, regardless of whether they're drawn from the source material.

Perhaps the most noteworthy and substantive change to Zack Snyder’s Justice League might be both its most reverential to the comics and, oddly enough, its most detrimental to the film as its own entity. Fans will get a charge out of it, but the restoration of supervillain Darkseid's heavier presence in the story also makes the film itself more cluttered, also introducing a secondary method of widely eliminating planets and lifeforms. Look, I understand the jolt of excitement that’ll come over fans when hearing certain things being name-dropped in a Justice League movie, but the inclusion of a more interesting “side plan” or “Plan B” that the real villain will execute later diminishes the impact of what’s going on here and now with Steppenwolf, which already struggles with 3 awkwardly volatile MacGuffin-like boxes being hunted down by a second-rate lackey (that still requires Superman to beat). This is one of the instances where any changes in the theatrical cut make some sense: in a movie already filled with a slew of new characters and hokey plot devices, it’d be best to leave the actual reveal of Darkseid and his bigger ambitions for a later date, if it comes.



Even though it was a rushed two hours, the original version of Justice League still does a fine enough job of giving the characters breathing room to be introduced and develop as beings, from the penniless and sarcastic youngster Flash to the gristly, boozy cynicism of Aquaman. Goes without saying at this point, but Affleck's Batman and Gadot's Wonder Woman are standouts regardless of the version. The Snyder Cut may add to certain aspects of their characters -- and, by undoing some of Whedon’s modifications, subdues them -- but for the most part, they feel roughly the same and not overhauled like Cyborg. Something else about this film as a whole remains true: there are too many new character concepts packed into too tight of a window, in which Snyder tries to force into existence something akin to the Marvel cinematic universe in a fraction of the time. An extra hour doesn’t help this, especially when it’s these additional character moments where the movie also indulges in more of Snyder’s slow-motion music video level of content. Pacing is certainly an issue with this lengthy cut of Justice League, and these elongated stretches feel like where the tightening or removal of content would be most justified.

Quick admission: I’m not much of a fan of Superman, but the charm and poise of Henry Cavill makes it very difficult not to embrace his rendition of the character on at least some level. To that end, the quest to resurrect Superman -- regardless of how exasperating the character’s endless powers may be -- remains an effective aspect of Justice League, amplified in Zack Snyder’s cut by delivering pure, unadulterated fan service. The most mocked aspect of Whedon’s Justice League, the awkward Superman intro where his mustache has been digitally replaced with an entirely new lower part of his face, has obviously been removed entirely. In its place, Snyder returns to the more successfully emotional aspects of Man of Steel in how he revives the Son of Krypton, both physically and emotionally, and yeah, there’s a black and silver suit involved. Whether this expanded glimpse into his comeback is any good or not, whether this and that make enough sense, becomes less relevant when Kal-El reemerges in those threads ... albeit, much, much later in the film. Between Cavill, the music and the spike in cinematic energy, it’s worth it.



Zack Snyder’s grand finale still has the same rough framework as the theatrical cut, but it feels very different in both tone and visual design. A frequent complaint with Snyder’s films have always been how dark and grim they are, and it’s pretty clear that creative decisions were made to “brighten up” the ending for theaters, from lighting up the sky with an apocalyptic orange hue to making dialogue quippier and emphasizing that the superheroes cared for civilians in the surrounding area of the final battle. For better and for worse, Snyder reverses these adjustments to craft a final act more aligned with his insistently gloomy sensibilities, shrouding everything in near-grayscale darkness and making it so the heroes are concerned with nothing else but their primary mission. It’s also more violent, leaning into its R-rated possibilities with the caliber of bloodshed. Those who were adamant about the theatrical cut’s inferiority will automatically see these changes in a positive light, but those changes also result in a leaden, nonsensical conclusion that misperceives decapitations and time travel as quality.

Opinions and attitudes about the Snyder Cut have run hot over the past year, with one side fully on the bandwagon with championing the continued potential of the Snyderverse and the other side arguing that his Justice League would follow suit with the rest of his subpar-reviewed superhero work. Regardless of where one falls on this spectrum, either side or in the middle, there should be at least one takeaway after finally seeing Zack Snyder’s Justice League: this is the cut that matters. There’s talk about which version will be the “canonical” choice for DC’s cinematic universe, but it’s a discussion that really doesn’t carry much weight, as they both essentially reach the same destination once it’s all said and done. One just takes the longer, preferred route with more interesting things to look at and has an ending that hits differently; either way, if they’re ready for Justice League 2, it’ll be easy to write a follow-up that essentially branches off from both. Thing is, even with a bizarre 4x3 aspect ratio, nobody’s going to want to go on Joss Whedon’s bumpy ride anymore after seeing this Snyder Cut.

Photos: WB/HBO